Every platform choice is the result of a concrete conversation with the client. Below are 6 representative examples (anonymized but real) of how we applied the methodology. In most cases WooCommerce emerges as the best fit for the European market, but we also show cases where another platform is objectively more suitable.
Case 1 · Food sector · WooCommerce choice
Food producer with 80 products and Italian ERP integration
Client: small artisanal pasta producer from Piedmont, 80 SKUs, 4 employees, revenue under €500K/year. Needs: sell online to end consumers, manage B2B orders with bars/restaurants, sync with Danea Easyfatt ERP for electronic invoicing and stock. No international sales currently. Catalog managed directly by the owner (marketing skills, not technical).
Final choice: WooCommerce. Rationale: native official plugin integration with Danea is mature, very low recurring cost (only hosting €300/year + Stripe for payments), easy WordPress backoffice for the owner. Online in 3 weeks (€2,950 Professional package), today managing 30-50 B2C orders/week + 4-5 B2B orders weekly, all synced with the ERP.
Case 2 · DTC fashion brand · Shopify choice
Sustainable apparel brand selling in 8 EU countries
Client: DTC brand of organic cotton t-shirts and hoodies, 200 SKUs (size/color variants), marketing-first team of 6 people, growing revenue. Needs: international selling in 8 EU countries with localized currencies, languages and taxes, native integrations with TikTok Shop and Instagram Shopping, fast time-to-market for seasonal collections, rich app store for marketing automation (Klaviyo, Yotpo reviews).
Final choice: Shopify Advanced + Shopify Markets. Rationale: Shopify Markets' native multi-currency management is unbeatable on 8+ countries, app store integrations with TikTok/Instagram are plug-and-play, marketing team uses backoffice without technical support.
Why not WooCommerce (our default choice)? WooCommerce was feasible but required 3-4 different plugins to cover multi-currency, multi-tax and TikTok/Instagram integrations, with heavier maintenance. For DTC brands selling in their home country only or in 2-3 EU countries we propose WooCommerce instead for the much lower recurring costs. Here Shopify won only for the combination of international marketing + 8 countries + marketing-first team. Online in 4 weeks.
Case 3 · Medium B2B distributor · WooCommerce choice
Restaurant supplies distributor with 1,500 products and customer pricing
Client: B2B distributor of professional equipment and packaging for the restaurant industry, 1,500 products with technical variants (capacity, materials, certifications), 200 professional customers with individually negotiated price lists, recurring weekly orders, also B2C retail sales. Needs: prices hidden from guests, mandatory login to see B2B pricing, repeatable orders from history, integration with European ERP, technical section with downloadable PDF datasheets.
Final choice: WooCommerce + B2B for WooCommerce. Rationale: the B2B plugin natively covers customer pricing, hidden prices, quote-based ordering. ERP integration is plug-and-play. Magento would have been oversized (catalog under 5,000 SKUs). PrestaShop feasible but with more premium modules to license. Online in 6 weeks (€4,950 Top package), today managing 80-120 B2B orders/week + 30-40 B2C orders, all synced with the ERP in real-time.
Case 4 · B2B industrial distributor · Magento choice
Industrial distributor with 25,000 SKUs and SAP integration
Client: industrial distributor of mechanical components, 25,000 SKUs with complex technical variants, 200 corporate buyers with multiple accounts, negotiated pricing per customer, real-time integration with SAP S/4HANA for stock, prices and orders. B2B needs: purchase orders (P.O.), multi-step approvals, audit trail for ISO compliance, deferred invoicing with custom payment terms.
Final choice: Magento Adobe Commerce B2B Edition. Rationale: at that SKU volume + advanced B2B + enterprise ERP integration, no other platform covers the scope.
Why not WooCommerce (our default choice)? For catalogs up to 5,000 products with medium B2B we always propose WooCommerce + B2B plugin (see Case 3 above), which covers that scope at 1/5 the cost. In this case however the 25,000 SKUs + SAP enterprise integration + 200 corporate buyers with multi-step approvals were beyond WooCommerce's sweet spot: it would have required extensive custom development, losing the speed and low-cost benefits that make it our default choice. Build time: 14 weeks, enterprise budget. Performance tripled after go-live thanks to Magento Cloud + advanced caching.
Case 5 · Multi-brand group · PrestaShop choice
Fashion group with 4 brands under one installation
Client: fashion holding with 4 different brands (luxury, casual, sport, outlet), each with separate product catalog but unified logistics/finance backend. Needs: manage 4 distinct stores (URL, theme, independent pricing) but with unified backoffice, shared warehouse, differentiated pricing per customer group, centralized invoicing.
Final choice: PrestaShop multi-shop. Rationale: PrestaShop was born for exactly this case (native multi-shop under one installation).
Why not WooCommerce (our default choice)? WooCommerce with WordPress Multisite could have covered the scope, but required 4 separate WordPress installations synced via API to share warehouse and customers, complicating maintenance and costs. PrestaShop native multi-shop is objectively more suitable here. That said: for the majority of our clients who do NOT have multi-brand under one installation, we propose WooCommerce instead for better ERP integration, superior SEO and lower costs. Magento would have been oversized (catalogs under 10K total SKUs). Online in 8 weeks, today the 4 brands share logistics backend with 60% infrastructure savings vs 4 separate ecommerce.
Case 6 · Professional services · WooCommerce choice
Consulting firm with service catalog and SEO blog
Client: HR consulting firm with 15 services sellable online (courses, audits, packaged consulting), editorial blog as primary asset for lead generation (300+ SEO articles), Italian ERP, average revenue €800K/year. Needs: integrate service sales with existing editorial blog (on WordPress), maintain Google ranking on strategic keywords, marketing automation for leads (HubSpot integration).
Final choice: WooCommerce (continuity with existing WordPress blog). Rationale: integrating another CMS would have broken the SEO structure consolidated over 5 years of blogging. WooCommerce has native HubSpot integration, ERP, subscription management via Subscriptions plugin. Online in 5 weeks without losing rankings on 200+ already-ranked keywords.